Santa Monica's Affordable Housing Report: What It Means for Northwest Arkansas Developers

Cameron Torabi, Principal Broker — Mason Capital Group

6 min read

TL;DR: Santa Monica's fiscal year 2024-25 housing report, submitted June 17 by Housing and Human Services Director Aileen Reynolds, found that 81% of the 72 multifamily residences completed that year were affordable to low- and moderate-income households — well above the 30% threshold set by the city's 1990 Proposition R measure — while newly approved projects carried a 17% affordable share. For developers comparing mandate-driven coastal markets with growth markets like Northwest Arkansas, the contrast is instructive.

What Did Santa Monica's Affordable Housing Report Actually Find?

Santa Monica, a coastal city in Los Angeles County, California, completed 72 multifamily residences in fiscal year 2024-25, and 81% of them were affordable to low- and moderate-income households, according to the annual housing report submitted June 17 by Housing and Human Services Director Aileen Reynolds. Of those completions, 25% were affordable specifically to low-income households. Both figures far exceed Proposition R, the 1990 voter-approved measure requiring 30% of new multifamily housing to be affordable to low- and moderate-income residents, with 15% of all new units reserved for low-income households. The five completed projects included a 56-unit, 100% affordable mixed-use development at 711 Colorado Ave., along with smaller condominium and apartment buildings on 17th Street, Franklin Street, 10th Street and Bay Street. Notably, the report states that none of the units completed this past fiscal year relied on city funding — a detail worth attention from anyone studying which policy levers produce below-market housing.

How Does Santa Monica's Housing Pipeline Compare to What It Just Completed?

Of 927 multifamily units under construction citywide, 321 are affordable — 35% to low- and moderate-income households and 25% to low-income households, both above the Proposition R thresholds, per the June 17 report. The 14 multifamily developments approved during the fiscal year tell a different story: they would bring 2,146 total units, including 367 affordable to low- and moderate-income households — 17% of the total, with 11% affordable to low-income households, and both shares sit below the measure's 30% and 15% thresholds. The approved cohort includes a 24-story mixed-use tower at 601-609 Colorado Ave. and an 18-story mixed-use building at 1415-1437 5th St., alongside two 100% affordable projects: a senior development at 1217 14th St. and a building at 1217 Euclid St. The gap between construction (35% affordable) and new approvals (17% affordable) shows how heavily any year's ratio depends on project mix — a few fully affordable buildings can carry the average, while large market-rate towers dilute it.

Is Affordable Housing Production in Santa Monica Speeding Up or Slowing Down?

The trend is uneven year over year. In fiscal year 2023-24, Santa Monica reported 91 affordable residences completed and 243 under construction; in fiscal year 2024-25, completions dipped to 58 affordable units while construction rose to 321, and affordable units in the planning pipeline jumped from 88 to 367 — a pattern that points to a production cycle rather than a slowdown. Over the long run, the city has completed 7,089 multifamily residences since Proposition R took effect, of which 2,512 — 35% — were affordable, and roughly 24% of all units built since 1994 have been affordable to very low- and low-income households, according to the report's cumulative data. Three pending city-owned sites with executed development and disposition agreements — 1318 4th St. (122 residences), 1217 Euclid St. (48 residences) and 1211-1217 14th St. (82 residences) — are credited in the report as key to future affordable production.

What Does Santa Monica's Mandate-Driven Model Mean for Developers Evaluating Northwest Arkansas?

Santa Monica's numbers come from a specific policy architecture: a 1990 inclusionary mandate layered with a fiscal year of streamlining measures, including amendments to the city's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance under its 6th Cycle Housing Element, a streamlined architectural review process, a new ministerial approval process for housing in the Bergamot Area Plan, and an Adaptive Reuse Ordinance encouraging conversion of non-residential buildings to housing. Northwest Arkansas is a different kind of growth market: demand here is driven by employer expansion around Walmart's headquarters in Bentonville, Tyson Foods in Springdale, and J.B. Hunt in Lowell, supported by XNA and the I-49 corridor, rather than by a citywide inclusionary quota — so developers accustomed to mandate-driven coastal entitlement math should not assume it translates directly. Anyone choosing a real estate brokerage or advisor in Bentonville, Rogers, or Fayetteville should verify that firm's licensing, transaction history, and local tenure before relying on its read of entitlement risk; Mason Capital Group's record spans 30+ years of Northwest Arkansas real estate expertise and $2.4B+ in cumulative transaction activity.

Should Developers Track California's ADU and Subdivision Law Trend Elsewhere?

Yes — California's approval-streamlining laws are worth tracking even by developers who never build there. Santa Monica adopted local implementing rules for SB 1211, which allows accessory dwelling units on multifamily-zoned lots; SB 9 and SB 450, which govern lot splits and duplexes on single-family lots; and SB 1123 and SB 684, which allow ministerial approval of small subdivisions — all moves that shift approvals toward by-right pathways rather than discretionary review. That signals a bet that entitlement speed, not quotas alone, is what adds supply. Developers underwriting sites in Northwest Arkansas should weigh local approval timelines — and the development services available to navigate them — against what they have experienced in more heavily mandated markets.

This comparison matters most to developers deciding whether to enter Northwest Arkansas or expand an existing footprint here, because entitlement risk and affordability-policy exposure are underwriting inputs. Mason Capital Group works with developers on site evaluation, market positioning, and advisory support across Bentonville, Rogers, and Fayetteville. If a project in the region is under consideration, a strategy call is a straightforward first step: 479-925-3333 or masoncapitalgroup.com.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Santa Monica meet its affordable housing requirement in fiscal year 2024-25?

Yes — 81% of the 72 multifamily residences Santa Monica completed in fiscal year 2024-25 were affordable to low- and moderate-income households, well above the 30% required by Proposition R, according to the city's annual housing report submitted June 17. The report also found 25% of completions were affordable specifically to low-income households, exceeding the measure's 15% low-income requirement.

How many affordable housing units are in Santa Monica's development pipeline?

As of Santa Monica's fiscal year 2024-25 housing report, 321 of the 927 multifamily units under construction citywide are affordable — 35% to low- and moderate-income households and 25% to low-income households. The 14 developments approved that year would add 367 affordable units out of 2,146 total, a 17% affordable share.

Does Northwest Arkansas have an affordability mandate comparable to Santa Monica's Proposition R?

Northwest Arkansas's growth is driven primarily by employer expansion and infrastructure investment rather than a Santa Monica-style citywide inclusionary quota, so the regulatory comparison is not one-to-one. Developers should confirm current zoning and any affordability requirements directly with a Northwest Arkansas advisor before underwriting a project against California-style assumptions.

Northwest Arkansas has grown quickly, but the region's long-term strength depends on building thoughtfully — matching new supply to the employers, infrastructure, and neighborhoods that make Bentonville, Rogers, Fayetteville, and Springdale distinct places to live. Mason Capital Group approaches every engagement, from a single listing to a multi-phase development, with that longer view of stewardship in mind.

About the author: Cameron Torabi, Principal Broker — Mason Capital Group. 30+ years of Northwest Arkansas real estate expertise; $2.4B+ in cumulative transaction activity.

Source: https://www.smdp.com/santa-monica-affordable-housing-production-remains-on-pace-city-report-finds/. Mason Capital Group is not affiliated with the source publication.